Do you not believe in honest conversation/ communication ??
It's like asking me if I believe in violence
Depends with who, depends on the context
I didnt ask you that , i asked about honest communication.
You originally said something like 'not downvoting means one has to engage and use rebuttal' , which i can agree with, but how do you have a conversation on the merits or lack of what someone posts if they're unwilling to answer the most basic of questions or simply post shit like ' you just dont understand - im not responding anymore'. It kind of invalidates engaging ...
You asked : "Do you not believe in honest conversation/ communication ??"
To which I essentially replied with "Depends with who, depends on the context"
No need to pretend I didn't answer when my answer doesn't fit your expectations...
>how do you have a conversation on the merits or lack of what someone posts if they're unwilling to answer the most basic of questions or simply post shit like ' you just dont understand - im not responding anymore'. It kind of invalidates engaging ...
What's the issue here exactly? If people don't want to respond or are running away from the debate, or make fool of themselves by pretending that you didn't understand while you clearly did it shouldn't be an issue, they're giving up or handing you the stick to beat them with
(post is archived)