After proving the gov can create and issue them a new religion like Q, the onus of proof is on others to prove they can’t be convinced of something imo.
I was just asking if you already had envisioned a particular scenario that I have obviously not thought of
Qtards switching side and becoming enemy of the constitution... How? That's a tough one, while I definitely see where you're coming from, with the blind faith/idolatry stuff
Technically, if the Qshit is indeed a DS psyop... They already have switched side, unknowingly, but they did, they worked for them
Them banning anyone who mocks Q already shows that their love for the first amendment is paperthin.
Yes, it's a subverse and doesn't impede your free speech from the rest of the website. But I don't see how that's different from Twitter banning the president and arguing he can still use other services. Until hosting services ban the alternatives. In spirit, it's the same argumentation.
Accelerationism
If Q followers start turning accelerationist, they can indeed start joining the opposite side and turn against the constitution believing that's the right thing to do
I know it sounds far fetched, but theoretically that's one way
True
(post is archived)