I was just asking if you already had envisioned a particular scenario that I have obviously not thought of
Qtards switching side and becoming enemy of the constitution... How? That's a tough one, while I definitely see where you're coming from, with the blind faith/idolatry stuff
Technically, if the Qshit is indeed a DS psyop... They already have switched side, unknowingly, but they did, they worked for them
Them banning anyone who mocks Q already shows that their love for the first amendment is paperthin.
Yes, it's a subverse and doesn't impede your free speech from the rest of the website. But I don't see how that's different from Twitter banning the president and arguing he can still use other services. Until hosting services ban the alternatives. In spirit, it's the same argumentation.
Accelerationism
If Q followers start turning accelerationist, they can indeed start joining the opposite side and turn against the constitution believing that's the right thing to do
I know it sounds far fetched, but theoretically that's one way
I suspect that if they had "won", so to speak, they would be a bigger danger to the constitution. Because then, one could tell them that certain things had to be done for the sake of the plan, it's 4d chess, and anyways don't you trust the patriots in control? I think we already saw this with them never questioning why Trump did certain things that were not in our favor.
Whereas now that they are in opposition, free speech will be more important for them. Censorship is only enjoyable if your side is in power.
A slightly different topic:
Q made me really cynical about people. Almost depressingly so.
It also awakened in me an interest in public relations and mass manipulation.
I suspect that Q hooked them similar to advertisement. Advertisement rarely sells you the product itself, but a subconscious desire. Deodorants sell you sex, candies for children sell you a happy family and beer sells you a good time with friends.
Q sold them the idea of knowing things ahead of time. Not just that, a false sense of security, justice and more. But I suspect that knowing things others don't and being proven right over time was the main pull.
And it completely surpassed any rationale thinking. In a way I never believed possible, if I hadn't I talked with them in the last few years.
And it's just some faggot on an image-board writing text. Whereas TV ads have emotional music and imagery.
True
(post is archived)