>I'm competent in numbers
Yeah I've been to college too, now what?
>and the scientists quoted specifically said that this number was likely too high due to the factors states.
"Likely"
yeah, as in "chances are", "odds", "guess"
>80% of the people allegedly exposed to the virus have no symptoms at all — they are called “asymptomatic carriers”. 80% of the people who get this injected into them have a “clinical adverse event”.
There
That's the only number in the said article
Now what? It's a shit vaccine? Probably
People with AIDS are asymptomatic too for quite a while so really, enlighten me here, where are you going with this number story?
What are you even going on about?
My question is pretty clear, read again
There are only two numbers in that article
>80% of the people allegedly exposed to the virus have no symptoms at all — they are called “asymptomatic carriers”. 80% of the people who get this injected into them have a “clinical adverse event”.
And from there, just like that because "you know numbers", you can tell covid19 doesn't exist/is just the flu
It's fascinating
Pretty sure you're talking about another post that's not mine.
(post is archived)