Are you a virologist? No matter your answer, your appeal to authority on an anonymous forum is a logical fallacy.
But since you are asking for credentials, my IQ is at least two standard deviations over the general population, I do know C, covid is bullshit, I am very comfortable in both the realm of statistics, and reading (as well as comprehending) scientific papers.
>Are you a virologist?
No I'm not. And the difference between you and me is that I don't claim I know it all based on conjectures, hearsay, and lame ass arithmetic
See? That's the difference
And just because you know C doesn't render you as competent in virology, this goes without saying of course
I'm competent in numbers, and the scientists quoted specifically said that this number was likely too high due to the factors stated.
My post was not to argue with you - who seems beyond saving - it was to help others who saw it to see another perspective.
>I'm competent in numbers
Yeah I've been to college too, now what?
>and the scientists quoted specifically said that this number was likely too high due to the factors states.
"Likely"
yeah, as in "chances are", "odds", "guess"
>80% of the people allegedly exposed to the virus have no symptoms at all — they are called “asymptomatic carriers”. 80% of the people who get this injected into them have a “clinical adverse event”.
There
That's the only number in the said article
Now what? It's a shit vaccine? Probably
People with AIDS are asymptomatic too for quite a while so really, enlighten me here, where are you going with this number story?
(post is archived)