Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

824

(post is archived)

[–] • 2 pts

The wave function is already a 3 spatial dimensional construct.

further what if it were expressed differently in higher than 3 Dimensions

It has a 4th dimension already called time.

Nonetheless, this is an outstanding problem in physics. It is unintuitive to the extreme.

[–] • 0 pt

In that case, it might be better to view the dimensionality expression interpretation inversely, where the observer is in the lower dimension state and observes the expression of a higher dimensional construct.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt (edited )

That is what is happening.

The subject is not just an observer, he is also the composer and director through the interactions one has with those dimensions via physical manipulation (the "echoes" and electrical emanations of kinetic energy), emotional energy interactions, thought interactions, and then the actual becoming of energy so you can directly interface with the constructs consciously (astral plane, magic mushrooms, etc).

So much to see and do there, it is stupifying when you "see" it.

I never realized how limited the human being is until I went there initially.

[–] • 0 pt

Indeed. This is a possibility. The imaginary dimension is unobservable.

[–] • 2 pts

the ocean has waves, but its a sea of particles. energy propels particles, this means the sea of particles will move like a wave. when the wave hits a vaccuum, it will release a particle into the void. when that particle hits another puddle of water, it will induce another wave again, and release another particle, unless the whole wave is absorbed already. the wave is nothing but synchronous movement of multiple particles.

one step up from the duality, is the triality. that means 3 forces are coinciding. duality is a nonsense simplification, like electromagnetism. theres more to it than just electricity and magnetism. everything is connected, its not just 2 or 3 imaginary forces.

[–] • 0 pt

Wave particle duality doesn't refer to the forces acting upon it.

The anology you proposed regarding an ocean wave made up of particles is inappropriate and not analogous. You are confusing aggregate behavior of molecules with individual behavior.

Quantum physics is counter-intuitive and based on probability. If you try to use macroscopic examples to explain subatomic particle behavior, it may not be correct.

Wave particle duality refers to a specific, observable phenomenon.

Thomas Young's double slit experiment confirmed that light had wave like properties because of the interference pattern observed upon irradiating a near wave-length sized double-slit that will result in a diffraction pattern consistent with wave-like behavior.

When the double slit experiment was performed by bombarding the double slit apparatus with electrons, a similar wave-like interference pattern was detected.

Similarly, there is other empirical evidence that confirms light, even though exhibiting wave-like probabilistic behavior, also possesses discreet quanta of energy, or paeticle-like properties. Wave -particle duality refers to sub atomic particles that have discreet physical parameters as well wave-like probabilistic behavior.

Why is there a superposition of both types of behavior, particle and wave, when we intuitively would assume that is not possible? That is what quantum physics attempts to elucidate mathematically. I am not smart enough to understand how. Hopefully I will be some day but I doubt it.

[–] • 1 pt
[–] • 0 pt

probabiliy refers to the size of your probe, you can only probe things to a limited precision.

the duality between electricity and magnetism, means magnetism will convert into electricity, because theyre basically aspects of the same phenomenon. in the double slit experiment there is no conversion of electron into wave, because they are already the same thing. without particle there is no wave, but both are imaginary, the moon is also a "particle".

light is imaginary and defined as the duality between particle and wave, the real known phenomenon thats happening is magnetism, magnetism may convert to electricity and then into some unknown force, but we can sum it up as one single wave.

[–] • 1 pt

Oh shit, my bad. You're retarded I shouldn't have engaged you.

[–] • 0 pt

Or it could be magnetic field interference.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

In quantum theory particle entanglement occurs when a subatomic particle decays into two daughter particles the daughter particles are said to be entangled. When particles are entangled measuring one will effect the other over distance and the communication between the entangled particles has been determined to exceed the speed of light. Einstein referred to this as the spooky action at a distance. Known as the EPR paradox (Einstein, Poldolsky, Rosen) Entanglement can and does occur when two particles encounter one another, interact and then separate. I believe that the microverse is a reflection of the universe. It's all tied together. Perhaps understanding the quantum level will provide us insight into ourselves and our perceptions of our surroundings. We are all intertwined. It's amusing that quantum particle physics reinforces my conviction and belief of the truth of everything Jesus Christ said some 2000 years ago. Most think that science and God are in opposition, my thought is that one cannot fail to explain the other. (God explains science, science explains God).

Here's the kicker. Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. You cannot measure quantum particles without altering them. Just observing a particle changes it. Interacting with, causes entanglement.

[–] • 0 pt

I feel that the "simplest" explanation is that it is a wave at all times. That's what the math and laws of physics tell us. The problem is that waves require a continuous number system (uncountable infinity), whereas our universe has been shown to be discrete (countable infinity)

So if the math says half a particle should be here, a full particle will be there half the time. There's a cool video by 3blue1brown showing this effect with polarized lenses. I think he worked with minutePhysics for it. On mobile so no links.

This would imply that the laws of physics exist outside our universe, or that higher dimensions have different number systems (domains) which is hard to prove and the interactions between our world and that one would be even harder to explain, so consider it more of a memory device.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

i dont think we really have much particles at all. i mean even particles are particles so their identity is already a little lost. i dont think much of 'da community' invests much thought into tiny bits indivisible exisiting either

[–] • 0 pt

what are we talking about here, reptilians?

[–] • 0 pt

No, a new and more elegant interpretation for the double slit experment than either Copenhagen or Many Worlds theories. This dimensionality expression interpretation ties the quantum mechanics back to classical mechanics and simplified tensor calculus.

[–] • 0 pt

I love that you wrote this. I’ve been thinking this for years and the easiest analogy I have for it is: Describe a radio wave, emanating from a single point, in 3 dimensions. The answer is: It’s a compression wave.

I believe the particle theory is nothing more than a limitation of our ability to measure and that there is an electromagnetic “aether” which has a viscosity. After all, light is not instantaneous; it has a limited speed. So ... why? Hmm. The speed of a wave relates to the viscosity and elasticity of the medium through which it travels.

[–] • 0 pt

Just approximate it as a straight line.

It'll make life easier.

[–] • 2 pts

According to the Law of Big Numbers, this is the best answer.

According to Set Theory, all wave functions are contained within the set of all approximated staight lines.

According to the Calculus Theory, the set of all approximated straight lines integrate into a single solid.

According to Absurdity Theory, all ideas are information and all information is simultaneously True and Bullshit at the same time.