Claims made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
If you make a claim, prove it.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12887469 Sexual factors and prostate cancer.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15069045 Ejaculation frequency and subsequent risk of prostate cancer.
Soooo, not ejaculating has no effect on prostate health. Also nothing to support anything like blueballs. A very minor possibility that ejaculating once a dayish in your 20s might maybe kinda lower your chances of prostate cancer
not ejaculating has no effect on prostate health
ejaculating once a dayish in your 20s might [...] lower your chances of prostate cancer
These statements seem to be contradictory.
Granted, one study doesn't settle the debate (as many of such studies' results cannot be independently verified).
But you asked for some evidence that there are negative side effects to holding in your cum, and some evidence was provided.
I would say the non evidence bearing claim is "blueballs are real" and my refutation of "nu uh" is perfectly valid. I'll entertain any reasonably researchable claim though, people gotta learn to learn for themselves sometime
Yeah, whenever someone makes a claim without proof I say
"An argument presented without proof can be dismissed without proof"
(post is archived)