https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12887469 Sexual factors and prostate cancer.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15069045 Ejaculation frequency and subsequent risk of prostate cancer.
Soooo, not ejaculating has no effect on prostate health. Also nothing to support anything like blueballs. A very minor possibility that ejaculating once a dayish in your 20s might maybe kinda lower your chances of prostate cancer
not ejaculating has no effect on prostate health
ejaculating once a dayish in your 20s might [...] lower your chances of prostate cancer
These statements seem to be contradictory.
Granted, one study doesn't settle the debate (as many of such studies' results cannot be independently verified).
But you asked for some evidence that there are negative side effects to holding in your cum, and some evidence was provided.
I actually didnt ask... nor was that the point. The point was blueballs being a real condition. I conceded in my original point that there could be health benefits regarding the prostate and ejaculating, but that it had nothing to do with the mythical "blueballs".
I say what i just said in regards to the studies you posted because those studies concluded that the correlation was negligible, but there could maybe possibly be a slight benefit during the 20s. But there was NO negative effects of not ejaculating frequently. Prostate health was not shown to be negatively affected. What was shown was simply the possibility of a small benefit (not an indication of a harm in the opposite case).
So yea, its possible shootin loads is like exercise for your prostate and has benefits. But you arnt gettin blueballs from not gettin off, and you arnt smoking prostate cigarettes by not getting off.
(post is archived)