So it is indeterminable whether the importance or unimportance of sinks is identical with or distinct from or is ontologically most prior, or is unimportant or unimportant, which allows the definitive determination of G.... Is a manner in style with the "arbitrary style" as contrasted with the "Godly style".... essentially and unambiguously determinable in regard to which style is used. So in regard to sinks, it is not determinable whether God's derivation was determined via the sink's importance or not... So if it is undecidable whether the style was the "arbitrary style" or the "Godly style" then the undecidability of some important x, or some x as important or not important decidably.... is unkowable... This itself is a Godelean M construction which favors the Godelean paradigm over the classically theist paradigm. So the importance of sinks, or the undecidability of whether the style is the "arbitrary style" or the "Godly style" itself is an undecidable Godelean, which sufficiently justifies the Godelean paradigm over the classically theist paradigm, which alters the existence of sinks as essentially or ontological important or unimportant decidably or undecidably... Or decidable as undecidable. Or something. Forever and ever.