Faguette is butthurt because I deleted a shitcomment in
Boohooo!
Faguette is butthurt because I deleted a shitcomment in /s/poaldev
Boohooo!
Fuck you, no one cares about your petty issues.
Fuck you, no one cares about your petty issues.
Gay.
Gay.
Who ever this fuck you guys is. He's rather popular
Who ever this fuck you guys is. He's rather popular
I don't trust the results of this poll.
I don't trust the results of this poll. @PS @Chiro @KingOfWhiteAmerica
Should have gone with someone other than Dominion.
Should have gone with someone other than Dominion.
I like that on top of this joke, there is an internal joke of the same format which this joke references.
So it is like a double joke.
And it is also a joke about a joke format, in the format of that joke, and the joke is in that format.
I can't tell if I just gave two separate conditions there or one.
Whatever, I can't even remember what I was trying to say.
But I wanted to use the term meta-joke also.
And then note that... There are meta jokes and double jokes.
Or maybe not note that.
... are all ......... or something about a class of objects where the meta-properties of a class equal t.....
gsadfgiadfjgaoidfhgjoiadfgjsoifgjaidfgaf=
I like that on top of this joke, there is an internal joke of the same format which this joke references.
So it is like a double joke.
And it is also a joke about a joke format, in the format of that joke, and the joke is in that format.
I can't tell if I just gave two separate conditions there or one.
@PS @KingOfWhiteAmerica
Whatever, I can't even remember what I was trying to say.
But I wanted to use the term meta-joke also.
And then note that... There are meta jokes and double jokes.
Or maybe not note that.
... are all ......... or something about a class of objects where the meta-properties of a class equal t.....
gsadfgiadfjgaoidfhgjoiadfgjsoifgjaidfgaf=
It’s Smartmatic!
It’s Smartmatic!
@PS @Chiro @KingOfWhiteAmerica
Don't shit all over your host on this FREE site. Feel free to stand up your own forum.
Don't shit all over your host on this FREE site. Feel free to stand up your own forum.
So it is indeterminable whether the importance or unimportance of sinks is identical with or distinct from or is ontologically most prior, or is unimportant or unimportant, which allows the definitive determination of G....
Is a manner in style with the "arbitrary style" as contrasted with the "Godly style"....
essentially
and unambiguously determinable in regard to which style is used.
So in regard to sinks, it is not determinable whether God's derivation was determined via the sink's importance or not...
So if it is undecidable whether the style was the "arbitrary style" or the "Godly style" then the undecidability of some important x, or some x as important or not important decidably.... is unkowable...
This itself is a Godelean M construction which favors the Godelean paradigm over the classically theist paradigm.
So the importance of sinks, or the undecidability of whether the style is the "arbitrary style" or the "Godly style" itself is an undecidable Godelean, which sufficiently justifies the Godelean paradigm over the classically theist paradigm, which alters the existence of sinks as essentially or ontological important or unimportant decidably or undecidably... Or decidable as undecidable.
Or something.
Forever and ever.
So it is indeterminable whether the importance or unimportance of sinks is identical with or distinct from or is ontologically most prior, or is unimportant or unimportant, which allows the definitive determination of G....
Is a manner in style with the "arbitrary style" as contrasted with the "Godly style"....
essentially
and unambiguously determinable in regard to which style is used.
So in regard to sinks, it is not determinable whether God's derivation was determined via the sink's importance or not...
So if it is undecidable whether the style was the "arbitrary style" or the "Godly style" then the undecidability of some important x, or some x as important or not important decidably.... is unkowable...
This itself is a Godelean M construction which favors the Godelean paradigm over the classically theist paradigm.
So the importance of sinks, or the undecidability of whether the style is the "arbitrary style" or the "Godly style" itself is an undecidable Godelean, which sufficiently justifies the Godelean paradigm over the classically theist paradigm, which alters the existence of sinks as essentially or ontological important or unimportant decidably or undecidably... Or decidable as undecidable.
Or something.
Forever and ever.
(post is archived)