WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

472

I see posts with 80 comments and 10 votes. The whole no down voting thing is retarded, but there also seems to be a problem with up voting as well. As I understand it, it is make Poal less of an echo chamber. Then why fucking have them ar all? Just make this a lawless shithole like the chans. Where we have to read every shit post and hope the next one is better.

People come to places that allow them to vote because it is peer reviewed content. I don't want to go through new all the time. I want what everyone thinks is best up front, and I want the option to sort by worst to best to see what the jews and faggots posted. I want people to know what they posted was retarded and I want people to have an easy way to tell them they are retarded without having to make a whole explanation. Receiving lots of downvotes is more likely to convince someone that they are retarded more than some long faggoty explanation. It's even better when you get them both.

If there is no response that I accept as a good reason not to, I will begin issuing up votes AND down votes freely whenever I like or dislike a post. That is why they exist on every website that offers them and that is how I will be using them. (If your comment gets a down vote and no reply then it was probably me)

Edit: One hour has passed since posting this and I got 4 up votes, 1 down vote (thank you), and 25 comments. Fuck you guys. If you have time to comment you have time to vote. I don't care which way, just fucking vote.

I see posts with 80 comments and 10 votes. The whole no down voting thing is retarded, but there also seems to be a problem with up voting as well. As I understand it, it is make Poal less of an echo chamber. Then why fucking have them ar all? Just make this a lawless shithole like the chans. Where we have to read every shit post and hope the next one is better. People come to places that allow them to vote because it is peer reviewed content. I don't want to go through new all the time. I want what everyone thinks is best up front, and I want the option to sort by worst to best to see what the jews and faggots posted. I want people to know what they posted was retarded and I want people to have an easy way to tell them they are retarded without having to make a whole explanation. Receiving lots of downvotes is more likely to convince someone that they are retarded more than some long faggoty explanation. It's even better when you get them both. If there is no response that I accept as a good reason not to, I will begin issuing up votes AND down votes freely whenever I like or dislike a post. That is why they exist on every website that offers them and that is how I will be using them. (If your comment gets a down vote and no reply then it was probably me) Edit: One hour has passed since posting this and I got 4 up votes, 1 down vote (thank you), and 25 comments. Fuck you guys. If you have time to comment you have time to vote. I don't care which way, just fucking vote.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

My point is that all websites that offer the option to vote on content are echo chambers by design.

Ah, I'm sorry I misunderstood that.

Poal is trying to be more committed to free speech than Voat or Reddit. Part of that commitment is sacrificing that sorting ability for actually letting ideas be posted and creating an atmosphere that's more tolerant of dissenting opinions. A nice side benefit is that this also means less downvote brigades from competing cliques/e-personality cults.

Then like I said before, if votes don't really mean anything besides a spam filter, then it just turns Poal into 8chan. All those things you say are bad are just part of the fun of being able voting. Yes, it's competition that makes things good. If you get a bunch of down votes an no one backs you up then you are probably a faggot/retard.

Why have votes at all if not voting lumps mediocre with shit tier posts?