Indeed. Others have mentioned this as well. I am seeing an odd number of them.
One of the hosts probably updated their upload/naming process. I'll check it out
thank you sir.
Indeed. Others have mentioned this as well. I am seeing an odd number of them.
One of the hosts probably updated their upload/naming process. I'll check it out
thank you sir.
End user needs to give it a name for a reason. Tagging requires a third party data base while free choice requires personal discipline. It is almost like the end user is demanding a web site to organize data at the whim of "malicious" software only to remove free will with impunity. Is this because it is easier to let other do all the hard work? Your demand retards common sense and personal responsibility.
forcing everybody who wants to help archive to find a file name for every image is not free choice it is an unnecessary burden. Randomly generated file names will give people the freedom to efficiently archive and not force them to waste time naming images. Pictures speak for themselves so naming them is retarded. A glance at the image thumbnail tells more than a file name.
Randomly generated file names will give people the freedom to efficiently archive
Randomly generated names? Ouch. It takes a malicious leech to justify that level of laziness.
says the new fag that has contributed nothing of value to this site yet leeches off it. neck yourself.
(post is archived)