Goats, of course.
We're known as bears now. Poal has come alive since putt threw us goats to the wolves and we became bears.
A wolf would be a good mascot too. Maybe a mangy, rabid, drooling one.
I'd highly, highly recommend that you don't focus on people. Focus on ideas. You can pick up a lot of good information, from a lot of people, if you are discerning. The trouble with people, meaning becoming attached to any one conspiracy theorist, is that once a theorist starts to build a brand and an audience on the basis of conspiracy, it tends to cause them to pursue something other than basic truth. They start to become a brand, and they identify with being the person who constantly offers new and exciting conspiracy 'gravy'. Once that happens, there is another motivation that exists, beyond the truth itself. I've not found a single example of a popular conspiracy theorist for whom this was not true, and I've wound up abandoning almost all of the people that I became attached to.
Over time, they move onto aliens, hollow earth, flat earth, lizard people, etc.
Their fictions become their sustenance.
Your best bet is to focus on ideas, not people. Focus on topics.
who are the NWO? canaanites? is 'the jews' an oversimplification?
the nwo is just billionaires, most billionaires are jewish
Gregory Klimov was the best Russian conspirologist:
One thing you should keep in mind is that no one source is going to tell you everything, and even if they did, they'd probably get a number of things wrong. You need to crowdsource your information from a number of different people who may each contribute some pieces of the truth.
Beware of getting stuck in "limited hangouts"-- people who will tell the truth on some things to draw you in, but then they will keep you in a bubble instead of pushing you to dig further. For example, James Corbett did a good video on how 9/11 had a lot of "exercises" happening at the same time to confuse people and prevent an adequate response... but then he won't go further in talking about how the buildings were controlled demolitions instead of falling from plane strikes, he won't talk about the 5 dancing Israeli spies who planned the event, etc. His info is useful, but sometimes you need to dig deeper and consult other sources to find out the whole truth.
Sometimes hangouts will also intentionally push you toward theories that are utter BS as well. This serves to de-legitimize anything you hear from them because it's from "that crazy guy". For example, Alex Jones has some great info but then he goes off about "interdimensional demons" and you think maybe everything he says is BS. Or if you try to find out what's really going on with space agencies like NASA, you run into all these flat earthers and any doubt over things like the moon landing gets labeled as "flat earth nonsense".
TL;DR be wary and always dig further
All promoted conspiracy theorists are Tavistock plants.
The question you need to ask is, Who is the best at proving criminal conspiracies?
Crrow777radio.com he has a podcast you can find on all those apps but the second hour you have to subscribe to and it’s well worth it
James Corbett. Always back up what he is saying with legit reference's. Doesn't have a side and doesn't fear monger.
He's great. I sort of forgot about him. Looks like he has recent ones on Great Reset and a new one on vaccines. Definitely going to listen to those.
He has good info, but I'm convinced he's a "limited hangout". He'll tell you everything about some topics that are "safe", but when it comes to issues like 9/11 or Zionist involvement in starting WWI, he'll hold back from telling the whole truth or will purposefully confuse the narrative.
I think he is a great starting point for red pilling, he backs up everything with undeniable references. He doesn't call out the jew explicitly in everything he does but that would also drive away new people from the main point. We are being controlled by the elites. He does lots of stuff about them like how (((they))) love dancing in New Jersey.
Stop with that faggot kike expression "Conspiracy Theorist"
I concur. Literate people call them conspirologists.
You just like that term because it's your username... I remember you pushing it on Voat and it never went anywhere. How about "truth-seekers"?
Truthers are called truthseekers or truthsayers.
Truthseekers are those willing to research.
Truthasyers are those exposing publicly.
I read all of David Icke's books in the 90s when the term conspiracy theorist was a badge of honour. The detail, history, proofs, etc were astounding.
I've never heard of that job
(post is archived)