WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

114
I'm all for a voting system, but if those votes have consequences, then I agree voting should be regulated to avoid large groups forcing their viewpoints on others. Also, if votes come with consequences besides that of people seeing your vote counts then I wouldn't call it speech.

I'm all for a voting system, but if those votes have consequences, then I agree voting should be regulated to avoid large groups forcing their viewpoints on others.

Also, if votes come with consequences besides that of people seeing your vote counts then I wouldn't call it speech.

Yes
No
Maybe
Fuck You!

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

I'm not really talking about populations where the children are raised in jew-funded education systems.

Really more like Reddit and parts of Voat, where there are usually grown individuals talking.

What is feminism?

What is the made-up idea of gender?

What is the made-up idea of race?

What is the made-up idea of equality?

What is the made-up idea of "the US is a democracy"?

Plus, these ideas grow because dissent of them is censored.

Do you still disagree?

[–] 1 pt

Plus, these ideas grow because dissent of them is censored. Do you disagree?

Yes. Because more and more people are realizing those jewish, forced ideas of subversion are lies.

Really more like Reddit and parts of Voat, where there are usually grown individuals talking.

So places in which downvotes were meaningful? Reddit has cancer brigades surely. I never saw it a single time on voat. I had seen a bunch of kike accounts kvetching about it though.

Free Speech on a forum is a completely useless and garbage thing to have. As I've stated and as history and reality prove countless times: jews will ALWAYS use it for subversion.

Anyone who claims otherwise after being pointed out how it works is retarded. And that goes for you too.

This is not difficult to understand. This is not a complicated subject. This is not an opinion. This is not lacking evidence. This is a fact of the universe. It may as well be a fundamental law.

[–] -1 pt

Ok so hold on.

Your comments are speech, surely. And let's say we agree that your downvotes are speech as well.

If we allow completely unregulated free-speech, as it currently works on poal, then your downvotes would censor the speech of others, which would mean it's not really free speech.

And if we limit access to downvoting then now that speech isn't free. So one way or another, you're limiting speech.

Which one are you more in favor of?

[–] 0 pt

Your comments are speech, surely.

Yes.

And let's say we agree that your downvotes are speech as well.

No. But arguing so would mean that any restriction on my ability to freely downvote is censorship. Your own fucking argument destroys itself. You're not arguing from a position of honesty. You're arguing from a position of deceit.

then your downvotes would censor the speech of others

Who fucking cares? Leave the community if you don't like it.

which would mean it's not really free speech.

It very specifically is. If you come into my club and start talking about how niggers matter or some other such kikery I will fuck you up and throw you up. That is neither censorship or not having free speech. I'm not a government, the here aren't government officials.

Stop intentionally conflating things in private with things in which a government is held to different standards.

It's extremely jewish. The way you argue, the points you make, the ideals you hold.