WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

961
I'm all for a voting system, but if those votes have consequences, then I agree voting should be regulated to avoid large groups forcing their viewpoints on others. Also, if votes come with consequences besides that of people seeing your vote counts then I wouldn't call it speech.

I'm all for a voting system, but if those votes have consequences, then I agree voting should be regulated to avoid large groups forcing their viewpoints on others.

Also, if votes come with consequences besides that of people seeing your vote counts then I wouldn't call it speech.

Yes
No
Maybe
Fuck You!

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Downvote brigading is more likely to promote a herd mentality. And that is certainly what the feature would be used for if the downvotes were able to hide posts.

[–] 1 pt

So would downvotes push a post/comment to the bottom? If so, then change that feature. If not, then remove the button entirely and replace with a Report Spam button or live with the fact heavily downvoted posts/comments would remain where they are based on time of posting (and whatever algorithms deal with upvote velocity and such).

As it is it seems like nothing more than a risk/reward button to condition users to act the way the admin wants. I'm not even that bunged up about making downvotes not a signal for disagreement, but it seems arbitrary and ill-suited to its supposed goal.

[–] 1 pt

If not, then remove the button entirely and replace with a Report Spam button

Yeah, it's not a bad idea. That's a UI call if anything.

But I don't really buy that all these concerned new users are upset over the UI. They want a feature change. No one new here is pointing out to that PIF is a pointless and terrible acronym, or that there is a grammatical error built into the poll feature.

[–] 1 pt

Impeach!