WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

243
I'm all for a voting system, but if those votes have consequences, then I agree voting should be regulated to avoid large groups forcing their viewpoints on others. Also, if votes come with consequences besides that of people seeing your vote counts then I wouldn't call it speech.

I'm all for a voting system, but if those votes have consequences, then I agree voting should be regulated to avoid large groups forcing their viewpoints on others.

Also, if votes come with consequences besides that of people seeing your vote counts then I wouldn't call it speech.

Yes
No
Maybe
Fuck You!

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

I know I've said things that people thought were genuinely retarded, and it took them a second to understand what I was trying to say. If people could just shut me up because they felt no one should listen to me then I would think this place is just an echo chamber.

And also being able to censor people like that is what leads to this rise of a majority censoring everyone else like they have in other forums.

I like the idea of being able to see how other people agree or disagree with an idea, but I don't like that it can be used to censor others, or that others can decide what I get to see.

[–] 1 pt

the majority not wanting to hear your kikery is bad

No. Fuck off and leave if you don't like that.

The premise lies on the ridiculous notion that all speech is good.

The premise lies on the ridiculous notion that all speech has value.

The premise lies on the ridiculous notion that all speech is worth hearing.

Literally non of the above three are true.

Moderated speech IS NECESSARY when kikes and shills et al. WILL AND HAVE SHOWN that they will use such policies to subvert from. This method is necessary to keep 230 protections. The admins can't modify speech or they'd become a publisher versus a platform.

The users, the community deserve to moderate their community through nonmoderation.

[–] 0 pt

oy vey, I've been found out.

But no seriously, I would say about whichever nigger-faggot-kike group you wanna avoid, they don't often turn a population by the spread of their ideas. It's usually done by the censoring of other groups' ideas.

So I would argue it's more dangerous to let everyone spam downvotes than to let everyone talk.

[–] 0 pt

they don't often turn a population by the spread of their ideas.

What is feminism?

What is the made-up idea of gender?

What is the made-up idea of race?

What is the made-up idea of equality?

What is the made-up idea of "the US is a democracy"?

You haven't been paying a single bit of attention to anything EVER if you believe what you claim. It's just wrong. Not partly wrong. Not incidentally wrong. Not contextually wrong. It is literally wrong.