Well sure. But then some others won’t think the person in question is a degenerate. And the person in question will gravitate to those offering positive feedback. Declaring them mentally ill is a good and a big first step.
What's the difference between considering them a degen and considering them mentally ill? It's all unwanted behaviour that's harmful to society at the end of the day.
Considering them degenerate is an opinion. Classifying then as mentally ill is a medical decree. We need to push the medical profession and politicians to declare these people mentally ill - officially. Then we can really start to take action.
No, they are literally objectively degenerate in a Darwinian standpoint. It’s not relativistic at all. They rape kids, they spread disease and destroy social cohesion. The ancients didn’t keep women out of power or kill faggots for fun dude. It served a purpose. It’s quantifiable. It’s the exact opposite dude, a medical decree is not an objective measure of anything. In 50 years it can be called a “mental disorder” to have an in group preference for your own race if you are white if academics say so. It’s completely anti-objective because humans are naturally in group preference because we are animals. You’re just completely wrong on this one dude. The opinion of acadmia is not objective. Nature is objective. For some reason you think laws written by man are objective truth and nature is subjective. You have it backwards completely. A dude writing on a piece of paper does not make something true. Truth is transcendent and above the opinions of humans.
(post is archived)