WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

100
A user just got stripped of all his points and levels for downvoting. I disagree with this policy but lets see what poal has to say.

A user just got stripped of all his points and levels for downvoting. I disagree with this policy but lets see what poal has to say.

Yes. The current policy is best. Leave as is.
No. The current policy is gay. Allow downvoting
Fuck You!

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 9 pts

Exactly. A massive negative vote score on a submission is simply a warning to the other readers that what you are about to read is retarded. There should be no punishment for that

[–] 5 pts (edited )

Retarded according to who, though? This site has just experienced a massive influx of new users who seem to not understand jokes a lot of the time.

Edit: and i came from Voat too so obviously not everyone. But try to put yourself in the shoes of someone who's been here for two years. A bunch of people come here and immediately demand a rule change so they don't have to read something they don't like? Gtfo of here.

[–] [deleted] 3 pts

Retarded according to the voters. I just dont think having downvotes or downvoting should have any effect on what I can post, or what suspicious tag I get.

Even if I saw something massively downvoted, I'll still read it (unless I recognize the user and know they post retarded stuff) and if I happen to like it or agree, I will upvote.

[–] 3 pts

This whole push to change the rules is coming from goats who just arrived. It's easy to say "my way is better" when it's what your used to.

Our system encourages dialogue. This whole downvoting thing encourages a reddit-like herd mentality, which is something I hope Voat users will learn to shed after being on this site for a while.

This, don't let the voat boomers nigger your site up.

Shall I pretend that armies of shills did not downvote brigade to drive certain current events material from the front page of Voat constantly? As in all day every day? And then sperg upvote their stale years old "funny" articles, etc. over and over to fill the void?

Now we're starting to get into the weeds a bit, because I dont think up vote and down vote should dictate the posts place in line. What if we were to do something that allowed people to change the sort features of the posts. That way if someone wanted to see posts in a sub ranked by votes (whether up or down) they could sort it that way. But that's too much changing stuff around. I would rather just have a system where downvotes have no effect and only serve as a warning to other readers that OP may be retarded.

If there is a downvote option with no consequence, it will be abused by (((The Usual Suspects))).