You're unable to tell a hypothetical scenario from an accusatory statement? I wanted to make it as improbable as I could, but apparently you didn't see it that way.
Your hypothetical scenario has nothing to do with the reality being discussed, it's useless and only serves to sidetrack the conversation since you want to use it as a pillar.
I see you're out of argument, as you're just resorting to picking apart my statement while offering some nonsensical phrasing to say nothing.
Remember, you're the one who claimed to be the smartest man in the room:
too bad i was raised by a psychologist
Someone who could see through "cheap tricks," but you appear to think I was accusing you of doing something completely unrelated to my statement, and now you try to move somewhere else by saying that's outside the scope of the conversation. Make up your mind, please.
Refusing to follow your attempts to derail this into something it has nothing to do with being "out of arguments".
It means I'm smart enough to see through the tactics you're trying to employ to control the conversation and I'm not falling for it.
This conversation was never about your hypothetical example, that's what you're trying to make it about.
I never said aou gurgles other people's cocks therefore your hypothetical example is garbage because you're basing your commentary on something that is far too detached from reality.
If you wanted your hypothetical example to be valid, you should've stayed within the proper context.
(post is archived)