What suggests anger in that phrase?
A history of being insulting in this thread suggests that any time someone replies to you in kind makes you simply throw out another angry term. Anger isn't always violent, but perhaps it was the wrong term this time. I think it fits, as it's being used as "argumentative, in a hatred sort of way."
become hostility?
It's not what you asked, it's the way you asked it. As I said earlier you could have said "Why are some users camping on multiple empty subs?" But instead you chose to ask that in a way that insulted those users, then went and insulted the site's admin and another user directly. That's hostility. That's why you instantly get shit on in return, because you shit on multiple people to start with. The more you continue that type of retributionary reply, the more people here are going to call you names and make fun of you.
A history of being insulting in this thread suggests that any time someone replies to you in kind makes you simply throw out another angry term.
Quote one "insulting" reply that wasn't preceded by another user insulting me.
Quote me insulting the site admin.
The only user i aimed the trigger at was because he's fucking immature and only knows how to throw dumb insults as replies, hence why it was formatted that way so he might have a chance of understanding what was written.
The very first thing you opened the thread with used the term "losers" - that's an insult. A mild one, but an insult nonetheless.
You insulted by suggesting "gargles his dick," implying homosexuality. That's an insult.
Any time you use a word or phrase like that, it comes across as insulting.
because he's fucking immature
Really? And you think that name-calling isn't immature?
I don't see how it's an insult to the admin to say that other users live to gurgle on his dick, it's actually a factual observation with what I've seen up to now. Like it or not, this community has users that suck up to him no matter what and that makes them cock gurglers.
TBH, i was very curious about the power of weaponized language on here and it seems to still have a lot of influence on users emotions, to the point of blinding them to the content of the offensive container.
Name calling is immature and as I've explained earlier, there was a reason I chose that method. Up to now you're the only user with enough maturity to look pass that and actually develop a conversation thread even though it's stuck around that subject.
(post is archived)