> What suggests anger in that phrase? A history of being insulting in this thread suggests that any time someone replies to you in kind makes you simply throw out another angry term. Anger isn't always violent, but perhaps it was the wrong term this time. I think it fits, as it's being used as "argumentative, in a hatred sort of way." > become hostility? It's not what you asked, it's the way you asked it. As I said earlier you could have said "Why are some users camping on multiple empty subs?" But instead you chose to ask that in a way that insulted those users, then went and insulted the site's admin and another user directly. That's hostility. That's why you instantly get shit on in return, because you shit on multiple people to start with. The more you continue that type of retributionary reply, the more people here are going to call you names and make fun of you.