Because, there is no such thing as hate speech, only free speech. Because as an American, I have rights. I have the right to not be censored by the American based platform I use. If I was on a Mongolian basket weaving forum, and I said something to hurt the Mongolians fefees, I'd expect to be censored. The 'fact checkers' are part of the psy op- the brainwashing and manipulation part. 'Fact checkers' exist to push a narrative. I don't read what they say because I don't want to be part of their programming push.
I think that the entirety of my post was lost on you.
I had to edit pay op (fucking autocorrect) to pay op. You covered a lot of ground and I only addressed one angle. Voat is gone, the threat is real.
Pay op. Fuuucckkk autocorrect!!! Psychological operation. So I just found out that autocorrect is happening when I post a comment. Interesting.
There is no such thing as a human right. Just power and what power allows you to do. Removing section 230 would do absolutely nothing to megacorps like facebook and twitter who literally are so powerful they leverage the state. It will effect places like THIS and is probably one of the reasons voat shut down.
I was referring to the Constitution of the United States in the Bill of Rights that accompanies it. I have seen this thing you speak of, human rights, being touted around by leftists. It's struck a chord with me when they said humans have a right to water. 3 days without water in your as good as dead. But labeling it a human right? Power uses things like this and it's psychological operations against the public. Brainwashing, manipulation, control, I don't have to tell you. You realize that when you see it. We can only speculate why it was closed. Personally I think the freedom of speech there was a threat to those in power. You also recognize that money is no object to those in power. Again, speculation.
No, there is no such thing as a natural human right at all. That’s what I’m saying. There is nothing protecting you to a right to life if you are inside the jungle, the tiger doesn’t care that somewhere 2000 miles away there’s a piece of paper that says you have a right to life on it. That’s what I was getting at, scribbles on paper are nothing, they are not magical. The constitution is not magical. If the state decided to take your guns away a magical power does not stop them from doing so. That’s what I meant about there being no such things as human rights because there isn’t. A human right is a state given right that is agreed upon by a collective of people with the same mindset and they agree to enforce and defend those rights. If the state does not enforce the right to free speech on megacorps then it doesn’t matter what the piece of paper says does it? This is how the real world works, might is right and the megacorps are mighty and are in bed with the mighty (the US government). They sell data and push propaganda to the state. They are invaluable to the state so the state will not enforce the law on them no matter what a scribble on a piece of paper says. The megacorps won’t even have to abide by the rules of a section 230 repeal, they have all of the power, all of the capital and all of the lawyers. This site would be shut down. Facebook, google and twitter are above the law, they can do whatever they want.
(post is archived)