What things? Objects clearly exist outside of experience. But to your mind if you have not seen or heard of it it might as well not exist.
quantum physics would seem to suggest its at least possible that objects don't exist without observation.
I am not educated in that subject but it seems silly to me. The whole schrodinger's cat existing and not is silly as well.
It is a bit silly since the cat is either alive or dead. It's can't be both. You only know what it is by opening the box to see that it had kittens, or not. That's what Schrodinger's cat example is meant to convey. It's a question of probabilities. Both possible until an observation confirms which it is.
Well it’s been proven that is how the universe operates.
Have you experienced an object outside of experience? Trick question.
What's your proof that "objects clearly exist outside of experience."
You can take a telescope and see things that the naked eye cannot see. A microscope can also see things that the unaided eye cannot see
Ok but you're experiencing the magnification of light through a telescope. That's still inside of experience. Are you telling me you did not experience the sensation of light coming through a telescope that magnified the light of another planet?
Everything from people to pencils.
(post is archived)