Why leave in "to a family"? It would have been more correct to make it "in 1953, in Brooklyn".
Why leave in "to a family"? It would have been more correct to make it "in 1953, in Brooklyn".
Clearly the person who edited the article is orphanist, and therefore biased against people-of-famililesness. All of their edits must be cancelled to correct this wrong.
Clearly the person who edited the article is orphanist, and therefore biased against people-of-famililesness. All of their edits must be cancelled to correct this wrong.
(post is archived)