(((They))) pushed Left vs. Right as a false Hegelian dialectic. Note though that Capitalism (creation of money from other money, i.e. usury) and Comminusm (the dissolution of the individual) are just repackaged Kabbalist notions of alchemy and deconstructionism.
Communism only ever works in a family unit and even then you have to constantly force people to do labour, like washing dishes or whatever.
You can be capitalist without money though? Just create a demand for something in return for x without state involvement (which we have too fucking much of). Money is obviously easier but usury is different. Imo I don't think you should be able to borrow money for anything other than a house.
Communism hasn't been viable since the first trade occurred and value was assigned to items.
(post is archived)