Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

625

The idea that we might exist within a simulation has been growing in popularity. It can only be speculated whether or not the "programmer" of our simulation would have god-like powers, or is only responsible for basically planting a seed . I think I would align with the latter of these two options.

So, assuming it's the latter, Do you suppose that as our programmer watches our collective intelligence and technology progress, slowly at first but moving at an ever quicker rate of advancement, it becomes as concerned as we might of AI's ever quickening advancement? Are we to god what AI is to us?

The idea that we might exist within a simulation has been growing in popularity. It can only be speculated whether or not the "programmer" of our simulation would have god-like powers, or is only responsible for basically planting a seed . I think I would align with the latter of these two options. So, assuming it's the latter, Do you suppose that as our programmer watches our collective intelligence and technology progress, slowly at first but moving at an ever quicker rate of advancement, it becomes as concerned as we might of AI's ever quickening advancement? Are we to god what AI is to us?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (9).
[–] • 2 pts

I think, in theory, they'd be facing the same ethical dilemmas as we would. Are they concerned enough to just turn it off? Or are they still curious how far it could go?

I'm not really convinced of the simulation theory either. I feel like one of it's arguments is basically "well, it can't be disproven so its probably true". That's not really enough for me, but I really do enjoy thought experiments.