WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

1.3K

I understand why it is detrimental to civilization and in that context it would be wrong. Anything else just doesn't make sense

I understand why it is detrimental to civilization and in that context it would be wrong. Anything else just doesn't make sense

(post is archived)

Provide one example of me saying or writing that I rejected the Christian morality. I reject the Christian God concept but absolutely agree that the Christian moral basis is an absolute for western civilization. It still does not address an inherent reason murder is wrong. Just an absolute that God says not to.

[–] [deleted] -1 pt

Provide one example of me saying or writing that I rejected the Christian morality.

2nd sentence - "I reject the Christian God concept ". You have thus rejected Western Christendom's morality which is the basis for our laws and ethics.

See I am not sure if you are a troll or just a very black and white bible thumper. Rejecting the concept of God does not mean one rejects morality.

There is no morality without and apart from God.

Murder of any kind is a-ok in feral tribes of savages from the pigmy to the aztec.... so morality isnt a biological thing. It just mattered if you had the biggest stick. Atheist, once given absolute power, have everytime decided these people or those need to die, what do they base their morals on when they do that? So who would you gas?