Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

544

I am considering to host the leaderboard at a third-party Wiki hosting service that allows collaborative editing.

If /s/ModAbuse scales up, it will become increasingly harder to maintain the leaderboard as a single person.

Wikia is linked to the Wikimedia Foundation, both co-founded by Jimmy Wales, therefore not suitable for hosting a list where a Wikipedia administrator is on Rank 1.

It would be even better if the Wiki hosting service allows anyone to submit pending edits, and trusted users such as /u/starjello and /u/CMAwatch to freely edit and approve/reject edits.

I am considering to host [the leaderboard](/s/ModAbuse/150834) at a third-party Wiki hosting service that allows collaborative editing. If /s/ModAbuse scales up, it will become increasingly harder to maintain the leaderboard as a single person. Wikia is linked to the Wikimedia Foundation, both co-founded by Jimmy Wales, therefore not suitable for hosting a list where a Wikipedia administrator is on Rank 1. It would be even better if the Wiki hosting service allows anyone to submit pending edits, and trusted users such as /u/starjello and /u/CMAwatch to freely edit and approve/reject edits.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (12).
[–] • 4 pts

What if we add an option to authorize specific accounts that gives them the ability to edit sub's wiki pages?

[–] • 2 pts

That would be awesome.

Here is how one could possibly implement it, if not with an edit revision log.

[–] • 2 pts

I've read it and we will think about a way to make it seamless for users.