WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

1.3K

I am considering to host at a third-party Wiki hosting service that allows collaborative editing.

If scales up, it will become increasingly harder to maintain the leaderboard as a single person.

Wikia is linked to the Wikimedia Foundation, both co-founded by Jimmy Wales, therefore not suitable for hosting a list where a Wikipedia administrator is on Rank 1.

It would be even better if the Wiki hosting service allows anyone to submit pending edits, and trusted users such as and to freely edit and approve/reject edits.

I am considering to host [the leaderboard](/s/ModAbuse/150834) at a third-party Wiki hosting service that allows collaborative editing. If /s/ModAbuse scales up, it will become increasingly harder to maintain the leaderboard as a single person. Wikia is linked to the Wikimedia Foundation, both co-founded by Jimmy Wales, therefore not suitable for hosting a list where a Wikipedia administrator is on Rank 1. It would be even better if the Wiki hosting service allows anyone to submit pending edits, and trusted users such as /u/starjello and /u/CMAwatch to freely edit and approve/reject edits.

(post is archived)

[–] 4 pts

What if we add an option to authorize specific accounts that gives them the ability to edit sub's wiki pages?

[–] 2 pts

That would be awesome.

is how one could possibly implement it, if not with an edit revision log.

[–] 2 pts

I've read it and we will think about a way to make it seamless for users.