It's a dodge because it doesn't address the origin, you're just kicking the can down the road because you dislike abiogenesis having zero evidence. You are just stating it already existed elsewhere and purposely ignoring how that life or any life existed. You know all of this is a dodge.
lol, hell no.
It's one of the ways to explain "Where do we come from?" as the title is asking, not "How life came to existence?".
You want the logic train to devolve into "but where did that life came from" repeatedly, just like you started to do with right . It's shallow. Because you dont want to discuss the origin (aka the intent of the op).
It's shallow.
Still more plausible than your god of the gap based answer.
https://poal.co/s/AskPoal/15986/cc22636d-3d2d-4866-8706-3343599688cf
No wrong answers god is plausible but like multidimensions and aliens it's just speculation.
So then just answer "here" or "earth" or say "i dunno" or "some place not here". Nice dodge. Feel free to actually answer my question at your convenience, or just leave your panspermia theory unsupported if you want.
So then just answer "here" or "earth" or say "i dunno" or "some place not here".
I already did. You just don't like the answer.
Nice dodge
lol
(post is archived)