You want the logic train to devolve into "but where did that life came from" repeatedly, just like you started to do with right . It's shallow. Because you dont want to discuss the origin (aka the intent of the op).
You want the logic train to devolve into "but where did that life came from" repeatedly, just like you started to do with /u/Boone right [here](https://poal.co/s/AskPoal/15986/2ac10494-68a8-4b64-a2fb-7b75136dbe2f). It's shallow. Because you dont want to discuss the origin (aka the intent of the op).
It's shallow.
Still more plausible than your god of the gap based answer.
https://poal.co/s/AskPoal/15986/cc22636d-3d2d-4866-8706-3343599688cf
> It's shallow.
Still more plausible than your god of the gap based answer.
https://poal.co/s/AskPoal/15986/cc22636d-3d2d-4866-8706-3343599688cf
If you have a rebuttal to my op then reply to it.
If you have a rebuttal to my op then reply to it.
I don't have a rebuttal because you didn't make a point besides wishful thinking.
My theory stands because it has been proven totally plausible thanks to tardigrades.
I don't have a rebuttal because you didn't make a point besides wishful thinking.
My theory stands because it has been proven totally plausible thanks to tardigrades.
(post is archived)