lol, hell no.
It's one of the ways to explain "Where do we come from?" as the title is asking, not "How life came to existence?".
You want the logic train to devolve into "but where did that life came from" repeatedly, just like you started to do with right . It's shallow. Because you dont want to discuss the origin (aka the intent of the op).
It's shallow.
Still more plausible than your god of the gap based answer.
https://poal.co/s/AskPoal/15986/cc22636d-3d2d-4866-8706-3343599688cf
If you have a rebuttal to my op then reply to it.
No wrong answers god is plausible but like multidimensions and aliens it's just speculation.
So then just answer "here" or "earth" or say "i dunno" or "some place not here". Nice dodge. Feel free to actually answer my question at your convenience, or just leave your panspermia theory unsupported if you want.
So then just answer "here" or "earth" or say "i dunno" or "some place not here".
I already did. You just don't like the answer.
Nice dodge
lol
Why not just say your fragility wont allow you to answer complex questions? I'll expect an attempt to answer in your next reply or just take it as a concession. Ive already repeated myself when i said i wouldnt, i guess i just overestimated you, my bad.
(post is archived)