WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

651

For instance let's say hypothetically an agent tried to convince me to perform a shooting and I discovered he was in fact an agent? Would I have any legal grounds to stand on?

For instance let's say hypothetically an agent tried to convince me to perform a shooting and I discovered he was in fact an agent? Would I have any legal grounds to stand on?

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

Of course you'd say that. You're at the top of my list starjello. I already have assembled a team of the countries finest lawyers. please explain my legal options to this pleb

[–] 7 pts (edited )

theoretically, you can sue the FBI for entrapment and possibly also for the hate crime of having one of their informants compare your username to anal lube. However, recent rape hoax cases have set new precedents and lowered the bar for evidence, so I would not be surprised if they then countersued for rape and won. This is a dangerous position to be in, so Boone I recommend we try to settle so you only have to go to jail for a little while.

Edit: I lost track of who was suing who so this may not entirely make sense. Nonetheless I am proud to have served as an attorney for whichever of you brought me on board.

[–] 4 pts

I lost track of who was suing who so this may not entirely make sense. Nonetheless I am proud to have served as an attorney for whichever of you brought me on board.

That's real dedication!

[–] 3 pts

At least im only getting a little jail time! Justice served!

[–] 4 pts

...so I would not be surprised if they then countersued for rape and won.

So forget entrapment, just sue for rape first... or better yet, .

[–] 3 pts

Thanks ivan. The courts have gone to shit. we need a new chief justice

[–] 2 pts

I suggest appointing to the chief justice position.

[–] 2 pts

compare your username to anal lube

Wow. I don't always catch "wooshes" as they boomerang past my head; but when I do... I feel fucking retarded for not noticing the first time.

[–] 1 pt

recent rape hoax cases have set new precedents and lowered the bar for evidence

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/violation

violation[ vahy-uh-ley-shuh n ]

>noun

>the act of violating.

>the state of being violated.

>a breach, infringement, or transgression, as of a law, rule, promise, etc.:

>He was fined for a traffic violation.

>desecration; profanation:

>the violation of a cemetery.

>sexual molestation, especially rape.

>a distortion of meaning or fact.

That's it

The breach, infringement, or transgression, as of a rule promise etc.. Or the distortion of a meaning... or profanation, desecration... Is rape.

It's not up to debate it's the very definition of violation, it's rape, case closed