It doesn't have so many definitions.
Are you just fucking with me?...
Comprehension of data and its storage in the human brain go hand in hand. To understand something, there's typically a point of comparison. Memory goes a long way in capability to grasp something. Therefore, intelligence is often denoted by the quality and quantity of memory one can access.
What's your deal, man?
ROFL, I thought I was upset. Are you okay?
I have no deal, but all you are describing is human experience and memory. And by your logic, all old people should be very "intelligent" since they have had the most memories.... That doesn't seem to be the case in reality.
Edit: and dare I even ask, who get's to decide what memories are of quality and not? LOL so many words you use, but with little meaning.
Any old person can forget things. Any old person can not have formed their ability to comprehend data.
Your flimsy rebuttal is a bit inadequate.
We could've avoided all of this with you simply saying in the beginning, "is all information valuable?"
My response would have been, yes, of course all info is valuable because the more you understand about anything and everything, the easier it is to see the patterns of pitfalls when it comes to veracity or importance.
Seemingly, your argument is that intelligence has to do with picking out what bits of data are important to remember.
I'm not sure, though, why you ignored my use of the word "efficiently" before comprehension. I would argue that that very word describes your definition of importance. Gathering any and all knowledge isn't efficient... but doing it in a way that costs less resources or avoids more obstacles... efficiently... is important, as I described in the very first comment in this chain.
Are you being tedious on purpose? Is this just you projecting?
Again, you're clearly bothered by something and now attempting to annoy me.
Why?
Perhaps I should be more direct. Again, I'm saying the very concept of "intelligence" is bullshit. Where do you see me saying
>intelligence has to do with picking out what bits of data are important to remember
I've never said that or implied it. In fact, this will be the second time I'm telling you "intelligence" is bullshit, try to remember who you are talking to, yeah?
>We could've avoided all of this
We are typing on a message board on a computer, is this really that agonizing for you?
(post is archived)