There you go again with the pretense. I've never said nothing can be defined. Why are you trying to convolute this? I explicitly asked you to define "intelligence." Nothing else. Are you alright, friend?
edit: but seriously, please stop putting words in my mouth. Make your point instead of speaking for me.
Your argument from the beginning has been that intelligence can't be defined, just like any other nihilist would say.
You could've just said intelligence was difficult to define, but you chose to make me repeat myself, to move the goal posts when I reminded you that efficiency is one of the words I used and now you're just making me repeat myself again.
That shit's annoying. That's something a brainlet would do.
Go be an annoying nihilist somewhere else.
>Your argument from the beginning has been that intelligence can't be defined, just like any other nihilist would say.
That's some sound logic there.
I tried to speak to you like you are a human being, but all you can do is get emotional and throw insults. Too bad. You actually end up insulting yourself. Bye.
(post is archived)