No, you're just being tedious and tilting at windmills.
Again, intellignece is marked by EFFICIENT comprehension and the ability to store and access data that is comprehended.
This is an explicit definition. This is easy to understand. Maybe you're just a brainlet.
Now, if your only aim is to continue to annoy me, then we're clearly done here.
I guess computers must be very intelligent. Calculators too. I mean, who needs human input, since all tech is basically "intelligent" right? So what's the difference then? Please explain to this brainlet.
We use that technology to aggregate data. The intelligence in humans, which afford them efficiency of grasping value, is what sets them apart from machines designed to simply gather data.
There's a reason humans have to interact with data aggregates for anyone to get any use out of them.
This is why I called you a nihilist, man. You're doing the whole, "nothing can be defined. nothing really matters" bullshit.
THIS IS NIHILISM.
There you go again with the pretense. I've never said nothing can be defined. Why are you trying to convolute this? I explicitly asked you to define "intelligence." Nothing else. Are you alright, friend?
edit: but seriously, please stop putting words in my mouth. Make your point instead of speaking for me.
>There's a reason humans have to interact with data aggregates for anyone to get any use out of them.
Are you serious? Name something that humans use that don't include human interaction.....
(post is archived)