Any old person can forget things. Any old person can not have formed their ability to comprehend data. Your flimsy rebuttal is a bit inadequate. We could've avoided all of this with you simply saying in the beginning, "is all information valuable?" My response would have been, yes, of course all info is valuable because the more you understand about anything and everything, the easier it is to see the patterns of pitfalls when it comes to veracity or importance. Seemingly, your argument is that intelligence has to do with picking out what bits of data are important to remember. I'm not sure, though, why you ignored my use of the word "efficiently" before comprehension. I would argue that that very word describes your definition of importance. Gathering any and all knowledge isn't efficient... but doing it in a way that costs less resources or avoids more obstacles... efficiently... is important, as I described in the very first comment in this chain. Are you being tedious on purpose? Is this just you projecting? Again, you're clearly bothered by something and now attempting to annoy me. Why?