I guess computers must be very intelligent. Calculators too. I mean, who needs human input, since all tech is basically "intelligent" right? So what's the difference then? Please explain to this brainlet.
We use that technology to aggregate data. The intelligence in humans, which afford them efficiency of grasping value, is what sets them apart from machines designed to simply gather data.
There's a reason humans have to interact with data aggregates for anyone to get any use out of them.
This is why I called you a nihilist, man. You're doing the whole, "nothing can be defined. nothing really matters" bullshit.
THIS IS NIHILISM.
There you go again with the pretense. I've never said nothing can be defined. Why are you trying to convolute this? I explicitly asked you to define "intelligence." Nothing else. Are you alright, friend?
edit: but seriously, please stop putting words in my mouth. Make your point instead of speaking for me.
Your argument from the beginning has been that intelligence can't be defined, just like any other nihilist would say.
You could've just said intelligence was difficult to define, but you chose to make me repeat myself, to move the goal posts when I reminded you that efficiency is one of the words I used and now you're just making me repeat myself again.
That shit's annoying. That's something a brainlet would do.
Go be an annoying nihilist somewhere else.
>There's a reason humans have to interact with data aggregates for anyone to get any use out of them.
Are you serious? Name something that humans use that don't include human interaction.....
Is making me sperg fun?
It really must be. I'm glad I could entertain you. :)
(post is archived)