Low IQ 3rd world savages are the problem, not their dumb belief system.
Low IQ 3rd world savages are the problem, not their dumb belief system.
It pains me to see too many bring up IQ.
Don't get me wrong - it matters. However, like I've said before, that's not all that matters. There are elements of every society that holds the individual back. For instance, our communities could commonly create stable geniuses, only to have them dulled by morans in places of power who's only aim is to ensure their inability to utilize their intelligence.
I've never understood how you guys can't see past the numbers.
It's like the money question: you may very well be the richest person around, but what do you do once you've purchased everything possible? What do you do if, instead, you never have anything available for purchase?
I get it - this may be a fault comparison because money is for goyim, but if we look past that for a minute and localize the assertion to the middle-class, we see that having all of the money in the world doesn't equate to having all of the potential in the world coupled with having anything available to you.
Too many of you sell yourselves short with falling for the continued "look at these numbers. if yours are better, you're better!" bait.
This faulty numbers smokescreen arises at many angles in these places. So much persuasion is based on constructing a model of comparison for you to focus on, only to ensure you don't think more thoughts about the system once you see your magic numbers are higher than someone else's.
Another thing it's doing is creating a dynamic of false-superiority. Now you'll never step away from these beliefs because once you enter the mindset, you believe that if you evade it you'll only ever be worse than you were before in comparison to someone else.
The ego is a nifty thing. Unfortunately, it's used against you much more than plenty of you seem to understand.
It pains me to see too many bring up IQ.
Don't get me wrong - it matters. However, like I've said before, that's not all that matters. There are elements of every society that holds the individual back. For instance, our communities could commonly create stable geniuses, only to have them dulled by morans in places of power who's only aim is to ensure their inability to utilize their intelligence.
I've never understood how you guys can't see past the numbers.
It's like the money question: you may very well be the richest person around, but what do you do once you've purchased everything possible? What do you do if, instead, you never have anything available for purchase?
I get it - this may be a fault comparison because money is for goyim, but if we look past that for a minute and localize the assertion to the middle-class, we see that having all of the money in the world doesn't equate to having all of the potential in the world coupled with having anything available to you.
Too many of you sell yourselves short with falling for the continued "look at these numbers. if yours are better, you're better!" bait.
This faulty numbers smokescreen arises at many angles in these places. So much persuasion is based on constructing a model of comparison for you to focus on, only to ensure you don't think more thoughts about the system once you see your magic numbers are higher than someone else's.
Another thing it's doing is creating a dynamic of false-superiority. Now you'll never step away from these beliefs because once you enter the mindset, you believe that if you evade it you'll only ever be worse than you were before in comparison to someone else.
The ego is a nifty thing. Unfortunately, it's used against you much more than plenty of you seem to understand.
IQ s a measure of 'intelligence' supposedly. Can anyone really define 'intelligence?'
IQ s a measure of 'intelligence' supposedly. Can anyone really define 'intelligence?'
Capacity to efficiently comprehend and store and access data.
Capacity to efficiently comprehend and store and access data.
So comprehension equals intelligence? Or is it the capacity for comprehension that is intelligence? Or is it the ability to access and store data? Which is it?
So comprehension equals intelligence? Or is it the capacity for comprehension that is intelligence? Or is it the ability to access and store data? Which is it?
The ability to grasp advanced concepts.
The ability to grasp advanced concepts.
Does that mean this excludes concepts not deemed advanced?
In other words, intelligence is only found when the concepts being understood is considered advanced. To whom does this consideration go to? And is there a limit or a bare minimum to the number of 'advanced concepts' that need to be understood to be considered "intelligent?"
What would be the criteria for grasping a concept? How would you even gauge the comprehension of any concept by any individual? With mere words?
Does that mean this excludes concepts not deemed advanced?
In other words, intelligence is only found when the concepts being understood is considered advanced. To whom does this consideration go to? And is there a limit or a bare minimum to the number of 'advanced concepts' that need to be understood to be considered "intelligent?"
What would be the criteria for grasping a concept? How would you even gauge the comprehension of any concept by any individual? With mere words?
"Islam is love, peace be upon you. Unless you don't do what I say, in which case you must be put to death."
It's sort of like asking if water is wet.
"Islam is love, peace be upon you. Unless you don't do what I say, in which case you must be put to death."
It's sort of like asking if water is wet.
boomer narrative.
Islam is a religion of shitskins that's making shitskin-societies work better than what those IQ-85 retards would otherwise be able to achieve.
The fact, that shitskins are tolerated in the west is the root of all problems westerners have with islam. So the question should be "Is humanism and lack of racism a disease", and the answer would be "Yes, absolutely".
Edit:
Also: Terrorism is the poor mans second amendment, which can't field a hugely expensive conventional army. There's nothing wrong with muslims becoming terrorists. The problem lies with us, because we're not shooting invaders on sight.
boomer narrative.
Islam is a religion of shitskins that's making shitskin-societies work better than what those IQ-85 retards would otherwise be able to achieve.
The fact, that shitskins are tolerated in the west is the root of all problems westerners have with islam. So the question should be "Is humanism and lack of racism a disease", and the answer would be "Yes, absolutely".
Edit:
Also: Terrorism is the poor mans second amendment, which can't field a hugely expensive conventional army. There's nothing wrong with muslims becoming terrorists. The problem lies with us, because we're not shooting invaders on sight.
islam is islam. it is both and neither.
islam is islam. it is both and neither.
What these types of questions do is terminate further comprehension of the subject.
Should someone venture outside of the prescribed notion that any group and every group can operate one of two ways with no nuance at all, they'll discover these types of loaded questions only further the desired termination of thought.
Why shouldn't we further understand these phenomena? Why must we stop at "this thing is good" or "this thing is bad"?
What these types of questions do is terminate further comprehension of the subject.
Should someone venture outside of the prescribed notion that any group and every group can operate one of two ways with no nuance at all, they'll discover these types of loaded questions only further the desired termination of thought.
Why shouldn't we further understand these phenomena? Why must we stop at "this thing is good" or "this thing is bad"?
Your expectations may lead you to disappointment.
Your expectations may lead you to disappointment.
Anyone can become smarter.
Your nihilism will inevitably disappoint you.
Anyone can *become smarter*.
Your nihilism will **inevitably** disappoint you.
Isn't that paradox?
Isn't that paradox?
Terror for fairly obvious reasons. But that doesn't mean it can't be a force for good. Traditional Islamic values make for a fairly stable society overall.
Terror for fairly obvious reasons. But that doesn't mean it can't be a force for good. Traditional Islamic values make for a fairly stable society overall.
I voted peace just since it's a stupid question.
A better question would be if you think Islam was made naturally (as it claims), was a Vatican plot to retake Jerusalem, or a Jewish plot to have an army of useful idiots.
I voted peace just since it's a stupid question.
A better question would be if you think Islam was made naturally (as it claims), was a Vatican plot to retake Jerusalem, or a Jewish plot to have an army of useful idiots.
Feel free to ask it.
Feel free to ask it.
(post is archived)