WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

491

Specifically, I'm wondering whether the location of section 8 housing projects, community development spending, and other publicly or privately supported community initiatives have been shown to take census racial data into consideration when choosing target areas.

And I know a lot of you are going to reply to this saying "of course they do because everything in our society is designed to attack and humiliate whites and give their money to 'minorities'." That's fine and generally I agree with that sentiment, but I'm looking to see if there's something more concrete we could point to as evidence.

It's so hard to search for this kind of info on the internet.

Specifically, I'm wondering whether the location of section 8 housing projects, community development spending, and other publicly or privately supported community initiatives have been shown to take census racial data into consideration when choosing target areas. And I know a lot of you are going to reply to this saying "of course they do because everything in our society is designed to attack and humiliate whites and give their money to 'minorities'." That's fine and generally I agree with that sentiment, but I'm looking to see if there's something more concrete we could point to as evidence. It's so hard to search for this kind of info on the internet.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt (edited )

When they build projects, whites move away and the neighborhood becomes a slum. Everywhere they built projects here used to be whites. They all moved to the other side of town and the houses became cheap as dirt.

Once they become cheap the government gets involved and says cheap housing goes to the "poor" first. After a set time investors can but in. But who would but anything next to a project as an investment anyway. Maybe a laundrymate?

[–] 1 pt

The current market doesn't really support flips, so I would guest most investment is "buy and hold" aka landlords.