WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

1.5K

Specifically, I'm wondering whether the location of section 8 housing projects, community development spending, and other publicly or privately supported community initiatives have been shown to take census racial data into consideration when choosing target areas.

And I know a lot of you are going to reply to this saying "of course they do because everything in our society is designed to attack and humiliate whites and give their money to 'minorities'." That's fine and generally I agree with that sentiment, but I'm looking to see if there's something more concrete we could point to as evidence.

It's so hard to search for this kind of info on the internet.

Specifically, I'm wondering whether the location of section 8 housing projects, community development spending, and other publicly or privately supported community initiatives have been shown to take census racial data into consideration when choosing target areas. And I know a lot of you are going to reply to this saying "of course they do because everything in our society is designed to attack and humiliate whites and give their money to 'minorities'." That's fine and generally I agree with that sentiment, but I'm looking to see if there's something more concrete we could point to as evidence. It's so hard to search for this kind of info on the internet.

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

They don't really get into the specifics here, but this census bureau page seems to indicate this information is used to the detriment of whites:

https://www.census.gov/acs/www/about/why-we-ask-each-question/race/

Race data are used in planning and funding government programs that provide funds or services for specific groups.

and

race data are used to:
- Establish and evaluate the guidelines for federal affirmative action plans under the Federal Equal Opportunity Recruitment Program.
- Monitor compliance with the Voting Rights Act and enforce bilingual election requirements.
- Monitor and enforce equal employment opportunities under the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
- Identify segments of the population who may not be getting needed medical services under the Public Health Service Act.
- Allocate funds to school districts for bilingual services under the Bilingual Education Act.

Based on those two pieces of information, it sounds like a benefit of being in a 'minority' neighborhood on the census might be a higher likelihood of recapturing some of your tax dollars in community development spending. And maybe a downside would be increased kvetching about inequality?

[–] 1 pt

I thought that reporting myself as a meat popsicle was best. Was I mistaken?

[–] 1 pt

And is that a Hispanic meat popsicle or a non-Hispanic meat popsicle? Hispanic is an ethnicity, so you can theoretically be both a meat popsicle and Hispanic.

[–] 1 pt

Do I get additional free government gibs if I say I AM hispanic?

Because I still won't.

[–] 1 pt

But also responding to all questions on the census is mandatory and you can face a fine if we decide to enforce.

[–] 1 pt

Oh you poor thing. Don't worry, we won't persecute you if you're a non-citizen.

It's better if you self identify as a nigger so they won't target your community for immediate destruction.

[–] 0 pt

Well that was my instinct too but, as always: source?

No need for sources, look at where niggers were sent with Section 8. Look how white schools are targeted for being inundated by niggers.

[–] 1 pt

look at where niggers were sent with Section 8

This is basically what I'm asking. If they were sent to white neighborhoods, what was the basis for their being sent there?

Was it data from the census?

[–] 1 pt

What’s the punishment for lying on the census

[–] 0 pt

That was my first question, which explains what Titus linked to.

It sounds like anywhere from $100 to $5k, but they are very unlikely to try to enforce a penalty. It sounds like you would be more likely to face consequences if you refused to take the census on privacy grounds than if you took it but lied.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

When they build projects, whites move away and the neighborhood becomes a slum. Everywhere they built projects here used to be whites. They all moved to the other side of town and the houses became cheap as dirt.

Once they become cheap the government gets involved and says cheap housing goes to the "poor" first. After a set time investors can but in. But who would but anything next to a project as an investment anyway. Maybe a laundrymate?

[–] 1 pt

The current market doesn't really support flips, so I would guest most investment is "buy and hold" aka landlords.