Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.2K

When resources and space become limited you kill off the excess men through war. Men take the horrible high fatality jobs to facilitate civilization and security at home. There are plenty of other examples of how expendable men are in comparison to women. I am not a math person and may be wrong entirely in my assumptions that it can be mathematically expressed. Figured it would be worth asking.

When resources and space become limited you kill off the excess men through war. Men take the horrible high fatality jobs to facilitate civilization and security at home. There are plenty of other examples of how expendable men are in comparison to women. I am not a math person and may be wrong entirely in my assumptions that it can be mathematically expressed. Figured it would be worth asking.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (13).
[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

Just different roles. I think males with the "warrior gene" are disposable and necessary for the preservation of the tribe. Men are either workers, leaders, or fighters.

[–] • 1 pt

men with the "warrior gene" are being systematically targeted through various wars and other means, in an attempt to rid the planet of them. Every major conflict since world war I, has been a major offensive against men with half a brain and a set of balls. While that was not the main purpose, im sure the zionist pigs have gleeful orgasms everytime a upright, strong, intelligent man gets greased by their best laid plans. just my opinion. it seems to me that men and woman were meant to work together and compliment one another. The new system seeks to create an imbalance, thus making society weaker.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt (edited )

Well as The System tried hijacking Irish youth to fight British wars, Irish militants were recruiting them to fight for Ireland instead 🔫🍀. So I'm saying an effort has to be made to utilize warrior gened young men for a righteous purpose.

[–] • 0 pt

i meant to reply to this days ago..

Yeah man, i do agree