You seem to be assuming you can't have organization/governance without the State. To be clear, I don't advocate for no organization/governance, I advocate for no governance without consent.
You can't please everybody, and you have to make rules for everybody
So you'll always have a relatively big chunk of the population that won't agree with all the program
And they won't agree to leave either
So, you'll have to resort to force, to remove them, to maintain your order of things...
And when you're dealing with millions of people... You'll have to organize accordingly
A government, is like, working for a living, a "job"
It's not necesserally something you enjoy everyday, and often, that's something you don't enjoy at all, all year long
But you need it
Because the alternative, is... Much less comfortable, and as much enjoyable if not outright worse
And they won't agree to leave either
Because they have nowhere else to go, and the land they were born on is their birthright.
So, you'll have to resort to force, to remove them,
This would work just fine except that's not what the State does. It does the exact opposite, keeping the unsubmitting imprisoned.
Not necesserally because they have nowhere else to go
Just because they are fine where they are and don't want to move that's all
Using force on 10 000 people? Armed?
You'll need an army for that, chain of command, logistics, administration, etc...
A fucking gov in the end, because that's where it leads
(post is archived)