So you'll always have a relatively big chunk of the population that won't agree with all the program
...
Just because they are fine where they are and don't want to move that's all
You contradict yourself.
>So you'll always have a relatively big chunk of the population that won't agree with all the program
...
>Just because they are fine where they are and don't want to move that's all
You contradict yourself.
Absolutely not
The fact they don't agree with "the program", has nothing to do with the piece of land they enjoy
You can very well love north america, the land for what it is, and hate "the program"/social order ruling it
There's zero contradiction
Absolutely not
The fact they don't agree with "the program", has nothing to do with the piece of land they enjoy
You can very well love north america, the land for what it is, and hate "the program"/social order ruling it
There's zero contradiction
Who owns the land? The people who live on it, or the people imposing rules upon it?
Who owns the land? The people who live on it, or the people imposing rules upon it?
The one who can enforce the rules on it, always
The one who can enforce the rules on it, always
(post is archived)