WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.4K
Planned obsooescence is a time bomb in products, particularly electronics by [Apple](/s/crApple). It means deliberately making a device become defunct sooner and components last for a shorter time. It is a tactic to make people purchase their next product sooner (after the deliberately shortened lifespan of their previous product expired). # Should planned obsolescence be **outlawed?**

Planned obsooescence is a time bomb in products, particularly electronics by .

It means deliberately making a device become defunct sooner and components last for a shorter time.

It is a tactic to make people purchase their next product sooner (after the deliberately shortened lifespan of their previous product expired).

Should planned obsolescence be outlawed?

No.
Yes, it should be outlawed.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

No. Have you?

And I know what example you're probably gonna give, but Somalia is the way it is because it's populated with Somalians.

Have you ever witnessed a country, where there's no State, that was populated with White people? Probably not because there hasn't been a country like that for centuries, and any historical records of any possible examples have been muddled by the Jew.

or in a political situation very close to it

The closest example to Statelessness in a White country in recent history is pre- Civil War America. A utopian society by today's standards.

[–] 0 pt

That's what I thought

It's exactly like those leftists advocating for communism who never lived in a communist country...

...

Any given human group, needs to organize in order to rule and protect the "perimeter", aka OurLand™

And the bigger the human group, the more complex the organization

And at some point, you end up with a gov

families, clans, towns, cities, states, countries...

And those who stay at mud hut level, get fucked by the better organized, that's what happens historically, that's why you have governments everywhere

Governments predate kikes

[–] 0 pt

You seem to be assuming you can't have organization/governance without the State. To be clear, I don't advocate for no organization/governance, I advocate for no governance without consent.

https://pic8.co/sh/vHzPto.png

[–] 0 pt (edited )

You can't please everybody, and you have to make rules for everybody

So you'll always have a relatively big chunk of the population that won't agree with all the program

And they won't agree to leave either

So, you'll have to resort to force, to remove them, to maintain your order of things...

And when you're dealing with millions of people... You'll have to organize accordingly

A government, is like, working for a living, a "job"

It's not necesserally something you enjoy everyday, and often, that's something you don't enjoy at all, all year long

But you need it

Because the alternative, is... Much less comfortable, and as much enjoyable if not outright worse