Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

337

What I'm describing is when someone buys a website (.com) to get the name then is looking to sell it to someone else at a higher price somewhere down the road.

I view it as completely fine myself as long as it's not cybersquatting.

Many people don't like this view.

funny side note - poal.com couldn't be used for a business probably... finding a free speech where someone like myself is saying "kikels kikeling like kikes" would probably stop that really fast (things are changing though to as well).

What I'm describing is when someone buys a website (.com) to get the name then is looking to sell it to someone else at a higher price somewhere down the road. I view it as completely fine myself as long as it's not cybersquatting. ----- Many people don't like this view. ----- funny side note - poal.com couldn't be used for a business probably... finding a free speech where someone like myself is saying "kikels kikeling like kikes" would probably stop that really fast (things are changing though to as well).

(post is archived)

[–] • 3 pts

I see no problem with it.

The only exception being when it's used for fraud. IE purchasing a site like www.rnicrosoft.com

Either way, I'm just waiting for someone else to make an internet 2.0 with a whole new set of addresses. Which I guess is what TOR might be, with .onion addresses.

[–] • 1 pt

lol, never thought of your side note. But yeah, whoever is sitting on Poal.com probably isn't going to see a return on that investment anytime soon.

[–] • 1 pt

Same as

If this was real estate it's like you just bought a bunch of walls (domain names), because you think they have a potential to attract future advertisers (they are well placed/have interesting names), and you sell those walls/domains to advertisers when they show up, so they can build their ad panels on them

What's the problem with that? None