Which is why being healthy prevails.
Which is why being healthy prevails.
No, I'm saying that your example was stale.
You gave a scenario in which both health and freedom were abset (absent) in the subject.
No, I'm saying that your example was stale.
You gave a scenario in which both health and freedom were abset (absent) in the subject.
I showed you that freedom can't be reached without health.
So I'd rather be healthy without freedom and get a chance to free myself from oppression than live a miserably unhealthy free "life".
I showed you that freedom can't be reached without health.
So I'd rather be healthy without freedom and get a chance to free myself from oppression than live a miserably unhealthy free "life".
The first comment that I made was:
If I could have one and not the other, I'd choose freedom every time.
The only argument I ever made was that if I had to choose between the two, I'd take freedom, because that would mean the freedom to die because I'm not healthy.
Your response was an example that misunderstood my argument.
I don't think this is a huge deal. I'm being pedantic, I get it.
The first comment that I made was:
>If I could have one and not the other, I'd choose freedom every time.
The only argument I ever made was that **if I had to choose between the two**, I'd take freedom, because that would mean the freedom to die because I'm not healthy.
Your response was an example that misunderstood my argument.
I don't think this is a huge deal. I'm being pedantic, I get it.
(post is archived)