Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

181

seems so based on TWOSs treatment (but sabas treatment is an anomaly)

i think it sure seems like poal has no fucking problem with doxxing. should i try some doxxing then?

unless poal admin can finally state their official stance on doxxing im very fucking skeptical of anyone's supposed claim.

if -dial/saba via one of his alts could tell me pymb2's location, id be happy to broadcast it outwards where you claim you wont do anything about it. after all, only doxxing on poal is your problem, right? :)

seems so based on TWOSs treatment (but sabas treatment is an anomaly) i think it sure seems like poal has no fucking problem with doxxing. should i try some doxxing then? unless poal admin can finally state their official stance on doxxing im very fucking skeptical of anyone's supposed claim. if -dial/saba via one of his alts could tell me pymb2's location, id be happy to broadcast it outwards where you claim you wont do anything about it. after all, only doxxing on poal is your problem, right? :)

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (67).
[–] • 3 pts

if 2 people commit the same punishable act, they must be punished the same.

Saba broke the ToS, WoS did not.

You’ve got a comprehension issue, faguette.

[–] • 0 pt

Saba broke the ToS, WoS did not.

according to you thats the case, but both of them doxxed, so both are doxxers.

so, some doxxers you punish and others you dont? THAT IS UNEQUAL AND CORRUPT AND YOU NEED TO TREAT BOTH THE SAME

[–] • 3 pts

Saba broke the ToS, WoS did not.

You’ve got a comprehension issue, faguette.

[–] • 0 pt

you're repeating yourself because you think being repetitive will make me fuck off, but you're trying to hide the fact you're a corrupt fuck with no clue what he's doing