Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

seems so based on TWOSs treatment (but sabas treatment is an anomaly)

i think it sure seems like poal has no fucking problem with doxxing. should i try some doxxing then?

unless poal admin can finally state their official stance on doxxing im very fucking skeptical of anyone's supposed claim.

if -dial/saba via one of his alts could tell me pymb2's location, id be happy to broadcast it outwards where you claim you wont do anything about it. after all, only doxxing on poal is your problem, right? :)

seems so based on TWOSs treatment (but sabas treatment is an anomaly) i think it sure seems like poal has no fucking problem with doxxing. should i try some doxxing then? unless poal admin can finally state their official stance on doxxing im very fucking skeptical of anyone's supposed claim. if -dial/saba via one of his alts could tell me pymb2's location, id be happy to broadcast it outwards where you claim you wont do anything about it. after all, only doxxing on poal is your problem, right? :)

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (67).
[–] • 5 pts

Saba broke Poal’s ToS.

You’ve got a comprehension issue, faguette.

[–] • 0 pt

thats not an answer

if saba's act was wrong. so was TWOSs, they must receive the same treatment and punishment. so, either unban saba or ban webofslime. if you try to use different standards for both, you seem like a completely corrupt powermod

either all of the doxxing is ok or none of it is ok. pick one

[–] • 4 pts

WoS didn’t break Poal’s ToS.

You’ve got a comprehension issue, faguette.

[–] • 0 pt

you're avoiding the question.