Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

859

seems so based on TWOSs treatment (but sabas treatment is an anomaly)

i think it sure seems like poal has no fucking problem with doxxing. should i try some doxxing then?

unless poal admin can finally state their official stance on doxxing im very fucking skeptical of anyone's supposed claim.

if -dial/saba via one of his alts could tell me pymb2's location, id be happy to broadcast it outwards where you claim you wont do anything about it. after all, only doxxing on poal is your problem, right? :)

seems so based on TWOSs treatment (but sabas treatment is an anomaly) i think it sure seems like poal has no fucking problem with doxxing. should i try some doxxing then? unless poal admin can finally state their official stance on doxxing im very fucking skeptical of anyone's supposed claim. if -dial/saba via one of his alts could tell me pymb2's location, id be happy to broadcast it outwards where you claim you wont do anything about it. after all, only doxxing on poal is your problem, right? :)

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (67).
[–] • 0 pt

he's a doxxer. you know he's a doxxer. you refuse to punish as he deserves, being a doxxer.

explain yourself. end of story

if you try and claim its not poals problem, then where the fuck did saba get the idea it was ok to try it

[–] • 4 pts

He didn’t break Poal’s ToS.

You’ve got a comprehension issue, faguette.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

if TWOS is a known doxxer, explain why he wasn't punished as a doxxer.

if TWOS can get away with it, explain why saba got banned for it

is it that apparently only pymb2 gets given doxx protection on this site?

if you're limited to only whats posted to poal, then you cant fucking punish me if i post it elsewhere, you have no jurisdiction according to your own rules

[–] • 5 pts

Saba broke Poal’s ToS.

You’ve got a comprehension issue, faguette.