WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

677

The more we live as 'free individuals' the more we are effectively non-free, caught within the existing frame of possibilities--we have to be impelled or disturbed into freedom.... This paradox thoroughly pervades the form of subjectivity that characterizes 'permissive' liberal society. Since permissiveness and free choice are elevated into a supreme value, social control and domination can no longer appear as infringing on subjects' freedom: they have to appear as (and be sustained by) individuals experiencing themselves as free. There is a multitude of forms of this appearing of un-freedom in the guise of its opposite: in being deprived of universal healthcare, we are told that we are being given a new freedom of choice (to choose our healthcare provider); when we can no longer rely on long-term employment and are compelled to search for a new precarious job every couple of years, we are told that we are being given the opportunity to reinvent ourselves and discover our creative potential; when we have to pay for the education of our children, we are told that we are now able to become 'entrepreneurs of the self," acting like a capitalist freely choosing how to invest the resources he possesses (or has borrowed). In education, health, travel . . . we are constantly bombarded by imposed 'free choices'; forced to make decisions for which we are mostly not qualified (or do not possess enough information), we increasingly experience our freedom as a burden that causes unbearable anxiety.

The more we live as 'free individuals' the more we are effectively non-free, caught within the existing frame of possibilities--we have to be impelled or disturbed into freedom.... This paradox thoroughly pervades the form of subjectivity that characterizes 'permissive' liberal society. Since permissiveness and free choice are elevated into a supreme value, social control and domination can no longer appear as infringing on subjects' freedom: they have to appear as (and be sustained by) individuals experiencing themselves as free. There is a multitude of forms of this appearing of un-freedom in the guise of its opposite: in being deprived of universal healthcare, we are told that we are being given a new freedom of choice (to choose our healthcare provider); when we can no longer rely on long-term employment and are compelled to search for a new precarious job every couple of years, we are told that we are being given the opportunity to reinvent ourselves and discover our creative potential; when we have to pay for the education of our children, we are told that we are now able to become 'entrepreneurs of the self," acting like a capitalist freely choosing how to invest the resources he possesses (or has borrowed). In education, health, travel . . . we are constantly bombarded by imposed 'free choices'; forced to make decisions for which we are mostly not qualified (or do not possess enough information), we increasingly experience our freedom as a burden that causes unbearable anxiety.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

I do believe in Free Will, but I'd probably say the same thing even if Free Will didn't exist because I wouldn't have any choice but to express my preordained opinion.

shit alt unless you can vet

If you didn't believe the lies in the first place and just rightfully attribute it all to being robbed by a powerful gang you wouldn't find it as emotionally distressing.

[–] 0 pt

I believe in agency, not free will.

[–] 0 pt

Don't wish for it... work for it.

Freedom is a politically useful illusion.

Nobody is free from cause and effect.

The most agency you have is to arrange your environment around you for a better life, it's just that most choose to indulge the more impulse driven dopamine cycle rather than seek gratification that can come from payouts of achieving long term goals.

[–] 0 pt

You are free to love Chef Dong's chicken.

[–] 0 pt

Fate demands that I answer in the affirmative.